Why this question feels harder than it should

Say a number too low, and you may leave money on the table. Too high, and you risk being filtered out before you've even had a chance to show your value. The discomfort is real — but a prepared, range-based answer removes most of the guesswork.

The range approach

Rather than a single fixed number, give a researched range with the lower end still being genuinely acceptable to you. This shows preparation while leaving room to negotiate once more details about the role are clear.

A range-based answer

"Based on my research for this role and my experience level, I'm looking at a range of [X to Y]. That said, I'm open to discussing the full compensation package and would want to understand more about the role's scope before finalizing a number."

If you're pushed for a single specific number

It's fine to name a specific figure toward the higher end of your researched range rather than the middle — most first offers land somewhat below the initial ask, so starting slightly higher gives you room to land in a range you're genuinely happy with.

Redirecting the question if it comes up too early

A polite redirect

"I'd love to understand more about the role and its responsibilities before landing on a specific number — could you share the budgeted range for this position?"

Many recruiters will share a range when asked directly, which then lets you respond with more precision rather than guessing blindly.

For freshers with no salary history to reference

Research market rates specifically for entry-level roles in your field and location rather than guessing, and it's completely reasonable to state you're flexible within a researched range while prioritizing overall role fit and growth potential.

Practice this and other tricky interview questions out loud before it counts.

Practice Interview Questions